One of the more interesting questions related to blacks serving in the American Civil War is this, did blacks (free or slave) serve in combat roles in the Confederate Army? Unquestionably the historical evidence is strong that some blacks – perhaps several thousand – did serve in the Confederate Army in unofficial, non-combat roles as servants, laborers, teamster, musician, cooks, etc. But the official record is very unsupportive that thousands of blacks served as official soldiers in the ranks of the Southern soldiers’ rosters.
When we use the word official we mean that a black soldier would have been documented through the same paperwork process as a white man would have in terms of enlisting, mustering in or out, and perhaps applying for pension benefits after the war. It is this logistical paperwork process that leaves a trail for historians to study and interpret.
But how strong is the primary historical evidence – letters, diaries, first-hand accounts, military records, etc., – that blacks served in combat roles for the South? It is an important question.
Besides the fact that it is important to preserve accurate history it is also important to “get it right” when it comes to knowing who fought in the Civil War so that these individuals can be properly honored and their place in history duly noted. Some who favor a Southern perspective on the war, particularly defending the proposition that the South did not fight to preserve or defend slavery, have argued that thousands of slaves fought on behalf of the South thereby proving that they were generally supportive of the Southern way of life.
Some people have suggested that as many as 30,000 blacks took on the uniform and actually fought for the South, but does the historical record support that amount? What exactly does the historical record provide us with any kind of confidence to be able to answer this question?
In short, if one sticks solely to the historical record for primary evidence of the black soldier picking up arms and fighting for the South, one can only conclude that the support for such a claim is scanty at best – merely anecdoctal – and entirely unsubstantiated at worst. Instead of the widely claimed and purported number of 30,000 fighting black soldiers for the Confederacy, an honest look at the historical record leads one to the conclusion that as little as under a hundred to as many as several hundred blacks may have actually engaged in combat for the South during the Civil War by actually carrying and discharging a weapon. How to interpret that evidence – or lack thereof – is left to the professional and armchair historians to debate.
It is widely accepted by historians that perhaps as many as 200,000 blacks served in the Union Army. That is a sizable number when one realizes that only 750,000 to 900,000 men even fought for the South during the entire Civil War. According to historian and Professor James I. Robertson, Jr., “Approximately 180,000 blacks served as Federal soldiers. This figure represents 9 percent of the North’s fighting force. One-third of the blacks (68,178) died in the service, with sickness causing thirty times more deaths than battle.” Soldiers Blue and Gray: p. 35.
For the Union side at least, the historical record is fairly definitive and clear: we know that about 9-12% of the Union Army was filled by black troops, depending on if one goes with the figure of 180,000 or 200,000 black Union troops serving. Black Union soldiers participated in at least 41 major battles and roughly 450 smaller actions. 37,000 black Union soldiers died in the Civil War. Though early black troops were not aggressively deployed as bearers of arms, it is the case that by the middle of the war, at least, more and more black Union troops were entrusted to carry arms and to perform in combat action.
CWG has discovered that historians and staff – notably Robert Krick – at Spotsylvania National Battlefield Park have sifted through about 100,000 soldiers’ records to see how many non-whites were represented. Non-whites could be blacks, Native Americans, and mulattoes. They found that only 20-30 non-whites were found out of 100,000 soldiers’ records. That is less than 1/300th of one percent. Taking into account that the following estimate involves more conjecture than a good historian would be comfortable with applying to acceptable methods of reliable historical inquiry, one can still get a fairly solid “finger in the air” estimate that if that same ratio of 1/300th was applied to the figure-range of 750,000 – 900,000 Confederates serving during the war from 1861-1865, then one could only reasonably conclude that, at best, between 250-300 black soldiers may have served in the Confederate Army, and of those an even much smaller percentage would have been entrusted to take up arms.
This might seem surprising but a leading Civil War historian, Professor James McPherson, who won a Pulitzer prize for a Civil War book he wrote, has gone on record to say that of the more than 25,000 soldiers’ letters he has personally read over the years, he has only found evidence that perhaps 6-12 black Confederate soldiers were even mentioned.
The reality is this, looking at the historical record itself when it comes to answering the question – did many black men, free or slave, take up arms for Confederacy - one can only confidently say that perhaps a few, maybe scores, did but anything beyond that is highly conjectural and suspect. The larger the number of fighting black Confederates grows by one who would purport that thousands, even tens of thousands of blacks actually carried arms and faced combat during the Civil War, the more any objective observer would have to wonder what his or her agenda really was.
The best evidence that blacks even served in the butternut uniform as official soldiers is suggested by records related to some blacks serving in a regiment from Louisiana and one perhaps from South Carolina.
Civil War Gazette (CWG) turned to a couple leading Civil War historians to address the question, how many blacks actually took up arms and fought for the South?
CWG asked Professor and Civil War historian-author Steven Woodworth about the number of blacks who fought for the Confederacy:
“It would be hard to prove that absolutely zero blacks fought in the Confederate army, but I think it must have approached that level. I wonder if “non-white” includes American Indians. I suspect it does and further suspect that American Indians would have been much more prevalent than blacks in Confederate ranks. I haven’t kept a count of how many Civil War soldiers’ diaries and letters I’ve read–I guess it has been quite a few–but I’ve never come across a single instance of a black serving in the Confederate army. Whatever may have been the number of blacks serving and actually fighting as soldiers in the Confederate army, it must have been a minuscule percentage–completely insignificant for anyone trying to make the argument that blacks saw the conflict as a war of Yankee aggression, felt it was their war too, and joined up to fight for the Confederacy. That’s just a fairy tale.”
CWG also asked Civil War author and historian Wiley Sword about blacks serving in the Confederate army as soldiers:
“The majority of black Confederates who actually fought were essentially with the army as servants or personal attendants for officers. This was especially true in the initial part of the war (1861-62), I have read occasionally about these slave/servants taking up a rifle and fighting in the ranks with their master. Otherwise, various mulattoes or persons with light complexions may have been directly enrolled in the army. Since it was against C.S.A. policy to enlist blacks in the fighting army (until the very last
in 1865), I doubt if formal records will show the extent of black combat participation. I’m convinced some did fight, but how many is a very subjective guess.”
For further reading on the role of blacks serving in the Confederacy check out:
- Black Southerners in Gray, Essays on Afro-Americans in the Confederate Armies, edited by Richard Rollins
- The Journal of Confederate History Series, Vol. XI, published in 1994 by Southern Heritage Press, Murfreesboro, Tenn.
- “Blacks in Gray”, by Jason H. Silverman. North & South Magazine, Vol 5, Number 3, April 2002: 35-45.
- “Black Confederates”, by Bruce Levine. North & South Magazine, Vol 10, Number 2, July 2007: 40-47.
- “United States Color Troops”, by Gregory J.W. Urwin in Encyclopedia of the American Civil War, edited by Heidler and Heidler: 2002-2003.
- “African-American Soldiers, C.S.A.”, by Frank E. Deserino in Encyclopedia of the American Civil War, edited by Heidler and Heidler: 16-18.
- “African Americans in the Confederacy”, by Edgar A. Toppin in Encyclopedia of the Confederacy, Volume One. Edited by Current: pages




10 comments
Comments feed for this article
May 20, 2008 at 11:31 pm
Jay Vogel
I was reading the story “Did Blacks Fight in Combat in the Civil War and I can account by the rolls in Summers County West Virginia (Then part of Mercer, Fayette, and Monroe counties that I can personally identify four African Americans that fought in the Civil War for the Confederacy. I regularly speak with a direct descendant of one of these veterans. I have also personally met a Deputy Sheriff at Central SC that has shown me and several other Union and Confederate Re-enactors his Great-Great-Grandfather’s enlistment papers identifying him as a solder. I have also attended a grave stone dedication in Monroe county West Virginia for a Black Confederate Civil War veteran identified as a soldier.
I have not look much into the numbers of Black Confederate Veterans that fought as soldiers before but for just running across this many by shear accidentally run-ins they must be more that your story and the historians say there are.
May 23, 2008 at 11:45 pm
borderuffian
“CWG has discovered that historians and staff – notably Robert Krick – at Spotsylvania National Battlefield Park have sifted through about 100,000 soldiers’ records to see how many non-whites were represented. Non-whites could be blacks, Native Americans, and mulattoes. They found that only 20-30 non-whites were found out of 100,000 soldiers’ records. That is less than 1/300th of one percent….estimate that if that same ratio of 1/300th was applied to the figure-range of 750,000 – 900,000 Confederates serving during the war from 1861-1865, then one could only reasonably conclude that, at best, between 250-300 black soldiers may have served in the Confederate Army, and of those an even much smaller percentage would have been entrusted to take up arms.”
====================
So Krick found 20-30 in 100,000? Maybe so.
But I found 29 in one regiment (~1,000 men).
Apparently the ratio is not consistent.
June 13, 2008 at 12:33 pm
jeremy baysinger
I think it obvious that more research on this matter is required. it seems to me that you are jumping to conclusions quite readily, which leads one to wonder what YOUR motives are for besmirching the memory of these brave men… it is a widely accepted fact that black men fought for, and supported, much of the confederate way of life. I personally do not think it necessary to place such emphasis on numbers, suffice it to say they were there, and they are remembered with honor.
July 12, 2008 at 12:09 am
Doug Spearman
We have a story in my family about my great, great uncle who took up his father/master’s rifle (my great uncle evidently went to war with him as a body-servant) when he died during battle, I believe in TN. Also, I’ve been reading Douglas Southall Freeman’s biography of Lee and in it, toward the end of the war it talks about Lee going to Richmond personally to plead with Jefferson Davis and the Confederate Congress to enroll blacks in the army – he was at that point desperate for troops. And evidently from what’s in the book, they reluctantly gave him the go ahead to conscript and enlist black troops.
July 13, 2008 at 5:12 pm
Secesh
I agree with Jeremy. This article appears to be Northern-biased. There are many references to blacks fighting for the Confederacy. Here’s a few your biased article missed:
1. Dr. Lewis Steiner, Chief Inspector of the United States Sanitary Commission, observed General Stonewall Jackson’s occupation of Frederick, Maryland, in 1862. He wrote:
Over 3,000 Negroes must be included in this number [of Confederate troops]. These were clad in all kinds of uniforms, not only in cast-off or captured United States uniforms, but in coats with Southern buttons, State buttons, etc. Most of the Negroes had arms, rifles, muskets, sabers, bowie knives, dirks, etc. … and were manifestly an integral portion of the Southern Confederate Army (in Barrow, et al., 2001).
This description of men wearing shell jackets or coats and carrying weapons suggests soldiers. It does not appear indicative of cooks or musicians or body servants. Of course, we cannot know by the description, but it suggests 3,000 armed black Confederate soldiers.
2. 2. Report of Frederick Douglass
“There are at the present moment many Colored men in the Confederate Army doing duty not only as cooks, servants and laborers, but real soldiers, having musket on their shoulders, and bullets in their pockets, ready to shoot down any loyal troops and do all that soldiers may do to destroy the Federal government and build up that of the rebels” (In Williams “On Black Confederates”).
Douglass’s report is clear: Black Southerners were fighting “as real soldiers.”
3. Monuments to Black Confederates – The Moses Ezekiel sculpture in Arlington Cemetery to the Confederate dead – his circular frieze clearly shows one of the Confederate soldiers as a black man in uniform and under arms.
4. Individual witnesses to black Confederates. See the following link for much more information: http://www.rebelgray.com/blacksincombat.htm
July 15, 2008 at 7:46 pm
Samantha Heatherly
I’m trying to find out information about my great great grandfather’s personal slave, who was also his friend. My ancestor was Samuel John Doyle. He and his personal slave were buddies growing up together. They received their schooling in the same barn together with the rest of the family’s children. I was told that Samuel Doyle released his slaves before the war, each with an education and an acre of land, because he believed that there was no true freedom unless you had an education to understand it and a way to make a living to preserve it. According to my grandmother, who was raised by her grandparents, Samuel and Sarah Louisa Shires Doyle, Sam’s personal slave/then freeman/friend fought with him on the side of the Confederacy. I only wish I’d remembered to ask the name of this man. After my great great grandfather died, several of the freed slaves would come to her during the depression to earn some money or a handout. Even when it was the roughest during the depression, she always had a job and some sort of payment for them, as she felt her family was still responsible to help them out, no matter how hard the times were. I can look and see if I can find the regiment number. Their plantation was in Tennessee, and Sam was known for breeding/raising/training Tennessee Walker Horses. Any information shared would be greatly appreciated, as one of the halls of records was burned down during the war, and so what I’ve gleaned so far is very sparce. Thank you!
July 19, 2008 at 2:38 pm
Gary
Here is a quote from Frederick Douglas “It is now pretty well established, that there are at the present moment many colored men in the Confederate army doing duty not only as cooks, servants and laborers, but as real soldiers, having muskets on their shoulders, and bullets in their pockets, ready to shoot down loyal troops, and do all that soldiers may to destroy the Federal Government”.
July 23, 2008 at 11:08 pm
alfred teixeira
Black confedate soldiers may be in the ranks, they did not fight as a group
for love of my people , why would they associate themselves with a
people that lynch, hungs us from the nearest tree to part of that history.
You cannot grab something out of thin air and say we have a part to
defend a way life that enslaved us. Those black soldiers were tricked for that purpose only if the south had won the war, we would be enslaved
all over again. You cannot be friends with a notion that something good is
going come out and everything going be just fine. Black would have been
enslaved all over again with no way out. Foolish way to think that things
or a way of life would disappear by a war between the whites.
April 20, 2009 at 5:13 am
Samantha Heatherly
I’ve come across some records listing my great great grandfather as Samuel Jackson Doyle, born 31 July 1837 in Rally Hill Tennessee, and his wife’s name as Sarah Adaline Shires born September 1836 in Rally Hill, Tennessee. Any information about them, their plantation (gifted to them as newlyweds) would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
May 7, 2009 at 1:47 am
Kenneth Rearden
Name: Samuel Jackson Doyle
RFN: 328
Change Date: 5 DEC 2006
Sex: M
Birth: 31 JUL 1837 in Knoxville, Knox Co, TN
Change Date: 24 MAR 2006
Death: 1908 in Nashville, Davidson Co, TN
Change Date: 24 MAR 2006
Note: Civil War records show he was a Private 11th Tennessee Cavalry.
Father: John Stafford Doyle b: 10 AUG 1807 in Columbia, Maury Co, TN
Mother: Polly Ann Thomas-Banns b: 02 AUG 1811
Suggested Next Step:
Search OneWorldTree for:
Doyle, Samuel Jackson
Marriage 1 Sarah Adeline Shires
Married:
Children
William Samuel Doyle b: 19 JAN 1865 in Columbia, Maury Co, TN
Benjamin Franklin Doyle Sr b: 27 OCT 1873 in Columbia, Maury Co, TN
Let me know if you would like more info. I’ll see what I can find.
Ken
——————————————————————————–